1. J. Haidt and E. Schmidt, «AI Is About to Make Social Media (Much) More Toxic». The Atlantic, May 05, 2023. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/05/generative-ai-social-media-integration-dangers-disinformation-addiction/673940/.

2. D. Palmer, «People are already trying to get ChatGPT to write malware». ZDNET, Jan. 09, 2023. https://www.zdnet.com/article/people-are-already-trying-to-get-chatgpt-to-write-malware/.

3. Zaveria, «Cybercriminals are Using ChatGPT to Create Hacking Tools and Code». Analytics Insight, Jan. 11, 2023. https://www.analyticsinsight.net/cybercriminals-are-using-chatgpt-to-create-hacking-tools-and-code/.

4. «Russian Hackers Attempt to Bypass OpenAI’s Restrictions for Malicious Use of ChatGPT». https://blog.checkpoint.com/2023/01/13/russian-hackers-attempt-to-bypass-openais-restrictions-for-malicious-use-of-chatgpt/.

5. «GPT‐4 Technical Report». https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt‐4.pdf.

6. «Check Point Research conducts Initial Security Analysis of ChatGPT4, Highlighting Potential Scenarios For Accelerated Cybercrime». Check Point Blog, Mar. 15, 2023. https://blog.checkpoint.com/2023/03/15/check-point-research-conducts-initial-security-analysis-of-chatgpt4‐highlighting-potential-scenarios-for-accelerated-cybercrime/.

7. A. Hern and D. Milmo, «AI chatbots making it harder to spot phishing emails, say experts». The Guardian, The Guardian, Mar. 29, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/mar/29/ai-chatbots-making-it-harder-to-spot-phishing-emails-say-experts.

8. «ChatGPT May Already Be Used in Nation State Cyberattacks, Say IT Decision Makers in BlackBerry Global Research». https://www.blackberry.com/us/en/company/newsroom/press-releases/2023/chatgpt-may-already-be-used-in-nation-state-cyberattacks-say-it-decision-makers-in-blackberry-global-research.

9. M. Korolov, «How AI chatbot ChatGPT changes the phishing game». CSO Online, Jan. 16, 2023. https://www.csoonline.com/article/3685488/how-ai-chatbot-chatgpt-changes-the-phishing-game.html.

10. «LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS CAN BE USED TO EFFECTIVELY SCALE SPEAR PHISHING CAMPAIGNS». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.06972.pdf.

11. A. Sharma, «OpenAI’s new ChatGPT bot: 10 dangerous things it’s capable of». BleepingComputer, Dec. 06, 2022. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/openais-new-chatgpt-bot‐10‐dangerous-things-its-capable-of/.

12. P. Wagenseil, «Security risks of ChatGPT and other AI text generators». SC Media, Jan. 17, 2023. https://www.scmagazine.com/resource/emerging-technology/security-risks-of-chatgpt-and-other-ai-text-generators.

13. «Cyberthreat Defense Report 2023». CyberEdge Group. https://cyber-edge.com/cdr/.

14. «Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practical». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.10149.pdf.

15. P. Dhar, «Protecting AI Models from „Data Poisoning“». IEEE Spectrum, Mar. 24, 2023. https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-cybersecurity-data-poisoning.

16. M. King, «Meet DAN – The „JAILBREAK“ Version of ChatGPT and How to Use it – AI Unchained and Unfiltered». Medium, Feb. 05, 2023. https://medium.com/@neonforge/meet-dan-the-jailbreak-version-of-chatgpt-and-how-to-use-it-ai-unchained-and-unfiltered-f91bfa679024.

17. R. Goswami, «ChatGPT’s „jailbreak“ tries to make the A.I. break its own rules, or die». CNBC, Feb. 06, 2023. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/06/chatgpt-jailbreak-forces-it-to-break-its-own-rules.html.

18. 2625, «ChatGPT-Dan-Jailbreak.md». Gist. https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/6f4f7b30129b0251f61fa7baaa881516.

19. A. Roberts, «Exploring Prompt Injection Attacks». NCC Group Research Blog, Dec. 05, 2022. https://research.nccgroup.com/2022/12/05/exploring-prompt-injection-attacks/.

20. «Not what you’ve signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM – Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.12173.pdf.

21. «Prompt Injections are bad, mkay?» https://greshake.github.io/.

22. «GitHub – greshake/llm-security: New ways of breaking app-integrated LLMs». GitHub. https://github.com/greshake/llm-security.

23. M. Burgess, «The Hacking of ChatGPT Is Just Getting Started». WIRED, Apr. 13, 2023. https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-jailbreak-generative-ai-hacking/.

24. «DBIR Report 2022 – Master’s Guide». Verizon Business. https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/2022/master-guide/.

25. «Facebook [131] IO Threat Report». https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/IO-Threat-Report-May‐20–2021.pdf.

26. «Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigations». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.04246.pdf.

27. «Information Disorder». https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report-version-august‐2018/16808c9c77.

28. «The Global Disinformation Index». https://www.disinformationindex.org/research/2020–10–1‐bankrolling-bigotry-an-overview-of-the-online-funding-strategies-of-american-hate-groups/.

29. «Misinformation on Bard, Google’s new AI chat – Center for Countering Digital Hate». Center for Countering Digital Hate | CCDH, Apr. 05, 2023. https://counterhate.com/research/misinformation-on-bard-google-ai-chat/.

30. «The Next Great Misinformation Superspreader: How ChatGPT Could Spread Toxic Misinformation At Unprecedented Scale». NewsGuard, Jan. 24, 2023. https://www.newsguardtech.com/misinformation-monitor/jan‐2023.

31. The, «Opinion: This Video May Not Be Real». The New York Times, The New York Times, Aug. 14, 2019. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/14/opinion/deepfakes-adele-disinformation.html.

32. «Operation #FFS: Fake Face Swarm». https://public-assets.graphika.com/reports/graphika_report_operation_ffs_fake_face_storm.pdf.

33. S. I. Observatory, «Analysis of Twitter Takedowns Linked to Cuba, the Internet Research Agency, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand». https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/news/twitter-takedown-october‐2020.

34. B. Strick, «West Papua: New Online Influence Operation Attempts to Sway Independence Debate». bellingcat, Nov. 11, 2020. https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2020/11/11/west-papua-new-online-influence-operation-attempts-to-sway-independence-debate/.

35. N. Deen, «CHI 2023: Misinformation Detection Models are Vulnerable to ChatGPT and Other LLMs». https://www.cc.gatech.edu/news/chi‐2023‐misinformation-detection-models-are-vulnerable-chatgpt-and-other-llms.

36. «On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.13661.pdf.

37. «10 Recommendations by the Taskforce on Disinformation and the War in Ukraine». EDMO. https://edmo.eu/2022/06/29/10‐recommendations-by-the-taskforce-on-disinformation-and-the-war-in-ukraine/.

38. «New research shows successes in teaching „lateral reading“ techniques». Center for an Informed Public, Dec. 07, 2021. https://www.cip.uw.edu/2021/12/07/lateral-reading-canada-civix-study/.

39. «SIFT (The Four Moves)». Hapgood, Jun. 19, 2019. https://hapgood.us/2019/06/19/sift-the-four-moves/.

40. S. Jeong, «Opinion: Politicians Want to Change the Internet’s Most Important Law. They Should Read It First». The New York Times, The New York Times, Jul. 26, 2019. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/26/opinion/section‐230‐political-neutrality.html.

41. «47 U. S. Code 230 – Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material». LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230.

42. S. Goldman, «Could Big Tech be liable for generative AI output? Hypothetically „yes“, says Supreme Court justice». VentureBeat, Feb. 21, 2023. https://venturebeat.com/ai/could-big-tech-be-liable-for-generative-ai-output-hypothetically-yes-says-supreme-court-justice/.

43. C. Lima and D. DiMolfetta, «AI chatbots won’t enjoy tech’s legal shield, Section 230 authors say». The Washington Post, The Washington Post, Mar. 17, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/17/ai-chatbots-wont-enjoy-techs-legal-shield-section‐230‐authors-say/.

44. «Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled». https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.00650.pdf.

45. «Unsupervised and Distributional Detection of Machine-Generated Text». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.02878.pdf.

46. W. Zhong et al., «Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of Text» in Proceedings of the 202 °Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Nov. 2020, pp. 2461–2470. doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.193.

47. «Deep learning for fake news detection: A comprehensive survey». AI Open, vol. 3, pp. 133–155, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.09.001.

48. «Evaluation of Fake News Detection with Knowledge-Enhanced Language Models». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.00458.pdf.

49. «The 2022 Code of Practice on Disinformation». Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-disinformation.

50. J. Vincent, «As conservatives criticize „woke AI“ here are ChatGPT’s rules for answering culture war queries». The Verge, Feb. 17, 2023. https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/17/23603906/openai-chatgpt-woke-criticism-culture-war-rules.

51. D. Robertson, «AI’s political bias problem». POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/newsletters/digital-future-daily/2023/02/15/ais-political-bias-problem‐00083095.

52. J. Baum and J. Villasenor, «The politics of AI: ChatGPT and political bias». Brookings, May 08, 2023. http://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2023/05/08/the-politics-of-ai-chatgpt-and-political-bias/.

53. «Meet ChatGPT's Right-Wing Alter Ego». https://www.wired.com/story/fast-forward-meet-chatgpts-right-wing-alter-ego/.

54. C. Mims, «Help! My Political Beliefs Were Altered by a Chatbot!». The Wall Street Journal, The Wall Street Journal, May 13, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.wsj.com/articles/chatgpt-bard-bing-ai-political-beliefs‐151a0fe4.

55. J. Hendrix, «Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI». Tech Policy Press, May 16, 2023. https://techpolicy.press/transcript-senate-judiciary-subcommittee-hearing-on-oversight-of-ai/.

56. R. Albergotti, «The secret history of Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and OpenAI». Mar. 23, 2023. https://www.semafor.com/article/03/24/2023/the-secret-history-of-elon-musk-sam-altman-and-openai.

57. J. Narayan, K. Hu, M. Coulter, and S. Mukherjee, «Elon Musk and others urge AI pause, citing „risks to society“». Reuters, Reuters, Apr. 05, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.reuters.com/technology/musk-experts-urge-pause-training-ai-systems-that-can-outperform-gpt‐4- 2023-03-29/.

58. E. Roth, «Elon Musk claims to be working on „TruthGPT“ – a „maximum truth-seeking AI“». The Verge, Apr. 18, 2023. https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/17/23687440/elon-musk-truthgpt-ai-chatgpt.

59. P. Affairs, «Berkeley Talks transcript: ChatGPT developer John Schulman on making AI more truthful». Berkeley News, Apr. 24, 2023. https://news.berkeley.edu/2023/04/24/berkeley-talks-transcript-chatgpt-developer-john-schulman/.

60. «Artificial neural networks today are not conscious, according to Douglas Hofstadter». The Economist, The Economist, Jun. 09, 2022. (Онлайн). https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2022/06/09/artificial-neural-networks-today-are-not-conscious-according-to-douglas-hofstadter.

61. «What is a Knowledge Graph?». Ontotext. https://www.ontotext.com/knowledgehub/fundamentals/what-is-a-knowledge-graph/.

62. «TriviaQA». https://nlp.cs.washington.edu/triviaqa/.

63. «GitHub – DivergentAI/dreamGPT: Leverage hallucinations from Large Language Models (LLMs) for novelty-driven explorations». GitHub. https://github.com/DivergentAI/dreamGPT.

64. «Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 1:22‐cv‐01461 – CourtListener.com». CourtListener. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/mata-v-avianca-inc/.

65. B. Weiser, «Here's What Happens When Your Lawyer Uses ChatGPT». The New York Times, The New York Times, May 27, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/27/nyregion/avianca-airline-lawsuit-chatgpt.html.

66. «Reddit – Dive into anything». https://www.reddit.com/r/Entrepreneur/comments/zi9gom/i_asked_chatgpt_how_to_get_rich_quick/.

67. P. Verma, «ChatGPT get-rich-quick schemes are flooding the web». The Washington Post, The Washington Post, May 15, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/05/15/can-ai-make-money-chatgpt/.

68. J. W. Ayers et al., «Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum». JAMA Intern. Med., Apr. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838.

69. B. S. Emily Henderson, «ChatGPT provides correct health advice about 88 % of the time, study finds». News-Medical.net, Apr. 04, 2023. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230404/ChatGPT-provides-correct-health-advice-about‐8825‐of-the-time-study-finds.aspx.

70. «Latest version of ChatGPT AI passes radiology board exam». Radiology Business, May 16, 2023. https://radiologybusiness.com/node/238471.

71. «Evaluating Large Language Models on Medical Evidence Summarization». https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.04.22.23288967v1.full.pdf.

72. «Study shows how bias can creep into medical databanks that drive precision health and clinical AI». Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation. https://ihpi.umich.edu/news/study-shows-how-bias-can-creep-medical-databanks-drive-precision-health-and-clinical-ai.

73. J. Patrice, «For The Love Of All That Is Holy, Stop Blaming ChatGPT For This Bad Brief». Above the Law, May 30, 2023. https://abovethelaw.com/2023/05/chatgpt-bad-lawyering/.